The student results archive · 2021 to 2026

One hundred thousand results.
Counted in pips, not promises.

Our students have generated over 100,000 results since 2021. The 977 published below are just the teaser — every one taken with CLF frameworks, concepts and strategies, nothing else, and judged the way traders judge trades: pips, risk to reward, stop, target, drawdown.

100,000+Results since 2021Member-reported
100%CLF frameworks onlyEvery trade below
161Trustpilot reviewsIndependent
Open the archive Learn the frameworks · £120
How to read our results

Five numbers tell the truth about any trade.

TAKE PROFIT ENTRY STOP LOSS MAX IN-TRADE DRAWDOWN: the deepest the trade went against the plan before paying out
Entry precisionHow close the fill sits to the turn. Ours are measured in single pips.
Stop lossSmall by design. Risk is capped at 1 to 2% before the trade exists.
Take profitPlanned before entry, not improvised after it.
Risk to rewardTP distance over SL distance. The number that makes losing trades affordable.
In-trade drawdownHow much heat the position took. Precision shows up here first.
One trade · member-reported · on the record

This is what a CLF entry looks like.

GBP/USD · long · M15 · shared by Mujahid, 2026. Scroll, and watch the whole trade assemble, exactly as the numbers were reported.

SESSION LOW STOP · 10 HEAT · 3 TP · +50 3 PIPS OFF THE LOW

Illustrative render of the member-reported trade. Values as shared; not live market data or advice.

The setup.

Price sells into the session low. Most traders are guessing here. A CLF entry waits for the level.

3 pips off the low.

That is the reported entry precision. Not near the turn. On it.

3 pips of heat. Ever.

A 10-pip stop protected the trade. The market only ever took 3 back. Accuracy shows up in the drawdown first.

+50 pips. Paid in full.

Planned before entry. 1:5 risk to reward, ridden to the target. Feelings never touched it.

The trade, in three numbers
3 pipsentry off the low
17:1payoff per pip of heat
5Rrealised, as planned

Member-reported result, published with permission, losses across the archive included as they are verified. Past results are not a promise of yours. Trading involves substantial risk; most retail traders lose money. Education, not financial advice.

Transcribed from 565 metricated posts · 2021 to 2024

Numbers you can’t fake.

10 pipsThe median stop across four separate years of posted setups. Not roughly ten. Ten.
102021102022102023102024
80%of entries reporting drawdown took less than 5 pips of heat on the way to targets with a 75-pip median. 15% reported none at all.
88%of metricated plans paid at least 1:5. More than a third aimed for 1:10 or better. The biggest on record: a 1:25.
7 of 8At the archive’s median 1:7, a trader can be wrong seven times out of eight and still break even. Run the maths yourself ↓

Computed from the 565 results with machine-transcribed metrics (512 with a stated stop, 453 with a stated or derivable risk-to-reward, 322 reporting in-trade drawdown), exactly as members posted them. 85% of metricated posts are GBP/USD — one market, studied relentlessly. Setups are shown as posted; realised outcomes are only counted where the member stated them. Past results are not a promise of yours: most retail traders lose money.

Three more entries · read from the original posts · checked by hand

It wasn’t a one-off.

Breakdown 01 · verified, target hit

Twenty times the risk. Zero heat.

Posted by BD on 5 August 2022, exactly as written: “5 Pip Sl · 103 Pip Tp · 0 Dd · Tp hit. Closed.” A five-pip stop paid a hundred and three. Price never traded a single pip against the entry. That is not luck at scale — that is an entry taken at the level, or not at all.

GBP/USDpair5 pipsstop103 pipstarget · hit1:20.6r : r0 pipsdrawdown
Open this result · see the original screenshot →
ENTRYSTOP · 5 pipsheat: zero · price never crossed entryTP +103 · HIT
Breakdown 02 · verified, position 1 target hit

Two entries. One idea. 0.7 pips of heat.

Tee, 18 January 2022: a “2 in 1” short — two positions on the same level, each risking 0.5%. Position one ran 84 pips to target with 0.7 pips of drawdown, as posted. Same stop discipline, doubled expression, risk still capped at a coffee’s worth of the account.

GBP/USDpair · short ×210 / 10stops84 / 53targets1:8.4 / 1:5.3r : r0.7 / 3.8drawdown
Open this result · see the original screenshot →
ENTRYSTOP · 10 pipsheat: 0.7 pipsTP +84 · POS 1 HIT
Breakdown 03 · verified, as posted

Risk deleted mid-trade.

Vinesh Khetani, 22 April 2022, posted mid-trade: “SL: 10 pips (BE now)” — the stop moved to breakeven once the trade paid its first leg. From that second onwards the worst case was zero. The framework’s quiet superpower isn’t the wins; it’s how early the losing scenario gets deleted.

GBP/USDpair10 → 0 pipsstop · moved to entry70 pipstarget1:7r : r0.6%risk
Open this result · see the original screenshot →
ENTRYSTOP · 10 pipsheat: 4.5 pipsTP 70 · STOP → BE
Archive analytics

The archive, analysed.

Every figure below is computed live from the verified results on this page. As each archive batch clears review and is published, these numbers update themselves. No hand-picked highlights.

Pips by year · verified archive

What the verified trades show

Member-reported, published with permission. Losses are part of trading; this analysis includes every verified result, wins and stops alike.

The industry baseline

The industry publishes its losses in the small print. We publish ours on purpose.

Regulated CFD brokers are legally required to disclose how many of their retail accounts lose money. Read a few of those warnings and a pattern appears. Then compare what this page is willing to show you.

What regulated brokers must disclose
Roughly 3 in 4 retail CFD accounts lose money.

Regulated brokers publish the share of their retail accounts that lose money in their mandatory risk warnings; across major UK/EU brokers those published figures commonly sit in the region of 65–84%. That is the industry describing itself.

What we put on the record
Every published trade carries its stop, target and drawdown.
5metrics on every result card: pips, R:R, stop, target, in-trade drawdown, or the card says unknown
166funded accounts achieved across the community, member-reported
265withdrawals made by members, member-reported
1 : 2%risk cap taught before any trade exists: small planned losses, by design

Different things measured, deliberately: brokers report account outcomes; we publish trade-level evidence and community milestones, losses included. Past community results are not a prediction of your own outcome. Trading involves risk; most retail traders lose money.

The mathematics of accuracy

Why one accurate trade outweighs many small losses.

Drag the sliders. This is the arithmetic the CLF method is built on: with a 1:5 risk-to-reward, you can be wrong most of the time and still come out ahead. See it for yourself.

+0.80R

Expected result per trade, in units of risk. Above zero, the approach pays over time; below zero, it bleeds.

100 illustrative trades at these settings

Planned winPlanned stop

Illustrative mathematics, not a projection or promise of returns. Real trading involves spreads, slippage, discipline and risk; most retail traders lose money. This is the logic we teach, not a guarantee of your outcome.

The archive

Trade by trade, year by year.

The archive is being migrated.977 member results from 2021 to 2024 are live below, year by year. The 2025 and 2026 Discord results channels are being verified and formatted next, and full trade metrics are being extracted for every screenshot. New data is added as each batch clears review.
Methodology

How results get onto this page.

✓Shared by students, with permissionEvery result is posted by the student in our community and published here with their consent.
✓Numbers, not narrativesEach card shows the same five metrics: pips, risk to reward, stop, target and in-trade drawdown. If a metric is unknown, the card says so.
✓Losses are part of tradingAn accurate system still takes stops. Small planned losses are the cost of the wins on this page, and no selection of results changes that.
✓Member-reportedResults reflect what students shared. Unless explicitly stated, they are not independently audited broker statements.
The straight version: trading involves substantial risk and most retail traders lose money. Nothing here is a promise of income or performance; past results do not guarantee future results. What this archive shows is what our students, taught precision, share every day. Education, not financial advice.
Beyond the archive

The community, in numbers.

Results are one lens. Here is what the wider CLF community reports, the same figures published across our qualification pages.

0
active traders in the community
0
funded accounts achieved
0
withdrawals made by members
4.9 / 5
161 independent reviews on Trustpilot

How the community trades

Funded account56%
Personal account54%

Figures voluntarily reported by a sample of our traders; many trade both. Past community results, not a prediction of your own outcome. Trading involves risk and outcomes vary by individual.

Precision is teachable.
£120 to sit the first lesson.

Take the £120 Level 2 See how Stargate screens trades

Published by the Come Learn Forex team. Results member-reported and shared with permission. Trading involves substantial risk; most retail traders lose money. Past results do not guarantee future results. Education, not financial advice.